April 2008
LOCAL CHILDRENS BOOK PUBLISHER TEMPLAR SPONSORS YOUTH FOOTBALL AND INFRASTRUCTURE AT
DORKING FOOTBALL CLUB.
Templar Publishing, local Dorking-based childrens
publisher is sponsoring Dorking Football Clubs Ltds Youth Teams and
infrastructure. Templars logo will appear on Dorking FCs First Team strip as
main Club sponsor. Templar will also be supporting Dorking FCs affiliated youth team
Brockham Badgers Family Day in May with a Book Tent and events. The Brockham Badgers
Book Tent will include events with local authors including Emma Dodd, author and
illustrator of What Pet to Get and I Thought I Saw a Dinosaur, and Derek Matthews, the
creator of the bestselling Happy Snappy series. There will also be competitions and craft
and drawing activities throughout the day.
Ruth Huddleston, Sales and Marketing Director for Templar Publishing says, We are
delighted to be sponsoring Dorking Football Club Limited. As a local company, producing
books for children, we feel strongly about linking with local initiatives for children and
football is a great way for us to get involved. We will also be publishing a football book
in 2009 from one of our top author/illustrators - Simon Bartram.
In March 2008, Templar was announced as IPA Independent Publisher of the Year 2008 at the
Independent Publishers Guild Conference in Brighton. Templar is well known for its high
quality childrens books including the bestselling Ology series (over 15 million
copies sold worldwide), the amazing baby series of books, and picture books including Calm
Down Boris which won the Richard and Judy Childrens Book for Christmas 2006 and Man
on the Moon: A Day in the Life of Bob which won the Blue Peter Book Award in 2004.
For more information, please contact: Jayne Roscoe on 01306 876361 or email:
jayne.roscoe@templarco.co.uk |
Announcement - 16th November 2007
Dorking FC attended a hearing at Reigate County Court on Friday 16 November. The club had
had less than 3 days to prepare for the hearing and to brief its lawyers after receiving
extremely short notice of the case from its landlord, Mole Valley District Council,
despite the council admitting it had been preparing for the case since July.
Despite arguing to the contrary for some considerable time, MVDC have now conceded that
Dorking Football Club Limited is a protected tenant under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
which affords the club protection from aggressive landlord behaviour, as well as security
of tenure at its Meadowbank ground for the immediate future.
As such, the club would like to reassure its supporters that football will continue at
Meadowbank so Dorkings first team, SYL Under 18 side, Dorking Girls and visiting
Bookham and Brockham Badgers sides fixtures will of course still be played as normal .
Dorking FC entertain Bedfont FC in a Combined Counties League match tomorrow, Sat 17
November.
The judge at Reigate County Court agreed to the clubs request for a reasonable
period for the club to file its evidence in response to the case brought forward by MVDC,
and due to the large public interest in the case, has directed that the case will be held
in February or later in Spring (at a date to be advised) at Guildford County Court before
a senior judge.
The case will be to consider a longstanding court application by the club for a new long
term lease of its Meadowbank ground, which MVDC are seeking to strike out as a matter of
court procedure. Even if the club are unsuccessful in the spring 2008 hearing, it will
still retain its protected tenant status under the Landlord and Tenant legislation, the
early 2008 hearing being to consider the strike out of the old proceedings.
The club believes it has a strong case and will be endeavouring to protect its position
with the help of its legal advisers. The club wishes to reiterate its disappointment and
frustration with the actions and conduct of MVDC, as summarised in our recent press
announcement and we must question the large sums of public money being thrown at this
matter by our local council and the motive behind this course of action.
Against the fact that Dorking Football Club Limited is a voluntary body and where the
matter could be sorted directly by constructive negotiations; and where the significant
funds being expended by DFC in defending its protected position could be better spent on
football and ground maintenance items, MVDC policy in this matter must be questionable.
Dorking Football Club Limited |
| Announcement - 13th November 2007 Dorking Football Club Limited were surprised and disappointed to see this
morning, 13 November 2007, via the Dorking Advertiser, a copy of a press release from MVDC
(MVDC) dated 12 November 2007 (issued after close of business) indicating that
MVDC will be taking steps to remove the Dorking Football Club from its Meadowbank
ground.
The Club has been in occupation of the Meadowbank site since the 1950s and
is operated entirely by volunteers for the benefit of the local community. It is
clear MVDC now wish to try to kill off a Club that has been in existence since the 1880s,
the second oldest in Surrey. We question the motives of MVDC and feel it is now time
for the local population to object in the strongest terms to the actions being taken in
its name by MVDC and the mismanagement of this issue by MVDC.
MVDC have sprung the release on us with no notice and we have very little
time to reply. A fuller response will be issued in the coming days.
However, based on the short amount of time available we would comment as
follows:-
· The press release issued by MVDC not only contains a series of
factual errors, but the Club is amazed that a public body can issue a press release
without prior notice to its long-term, loyal tenant, MVDC seemingly seeking to obtain
favourable press coverage in circumstances where no notice of this has been given to the
Club. At the time of writing, we have still seen no formal papers from MVDC in
relation to this matter. We question whether this is an appropriate way for a public
body to act against a small, voluntarily run organisation.
· Dorking Football Club Limited is a protected tenant under the
Landlord & Tenant Legislation and cannot be removed from the site without due process
being done. It is entitled to a new long-term lease, part of which would contain
staged repair provisions and we have repeatedly asked MVDC to constructively discuss this,
but MVDC have shown no real intention or desire to discuss this with us. We can only
assume that there is some pre-determined course of action which MVDC are now
following.
· We strongly question how aware individual councillors are of the
complete and accurate facts of this matter, something that we will be seeking to address
over the coming weeks. The Club owes no material monies to MVDC for rent or
otherwise and is solvent. The Club will also be seeking meetings with local
councillors, our local MP and are strongly considering making a complaint to the local
authority ombudsman as the Club sincerely believes that a grave injustice is being
done.
· The Club was subjected by MVDC to a statutory health and safety
inspection in the summer, to which the Club rigorously responded. MVDC accepted in
the summer that the Club would first address the health and safety issue, before returning
to the repair issue. The Club is confident that it has now satisfied MVDC in
relation to health and safety matters and believes it must have one of the safest sports
grounds at this level in Surrey. It has correspondence from MVDC in September 2007
to say that MVDC is pleased with the substantial works undertaken by the Club,
which are estimated to have a value of around £10,000. The final health and safety
inspection is due for Wednesday 14 November, so the Club is amazed at the timing of MVDC
in issuing a press release, which the Club again stresses was issued without prior notice
to the Club and which would seem to go back on the pre-agreed course of action.
· Councillor Derrick Burt shows a lack of understanding of football
and the law in stating that the Football Club (The Chicks) itself will
not disappear. Dorking Football Club is owned and managed by Dorking Football
Club Limited. The Club and the name The Chicks is an asset of the
football club company. It is not transferable at the whim of MVDC.
· Janette Purkiss is a new councillor and shows her lack of
knowledge of the facts when she states that MVDC have made numerous approaches to the
Club. This is simply incorrect - MVDC have not assisted the Club in any material way
in its community work nor (in the opinion of the Club) held constructive discussions with
the Club about the repair issue.
· We will be setting out our side of the story in more detail in
the coming days, but we would make the following statements:-
1. Dorking
Football Club Limited is operated by volunteers who are giving up their time and money in
order to operate the Club for the benefit of the community. In addition to its first
team, it is operating a successful under 18 boys football side at a high level and
operates girls football teams. It has a strong affiliation with Brockham
Badgers Football Club, which has over 350 children playing for it. Why are MVDC
taking such punitive action against a community Club?
2. In
the early 2000s, MVDC approved an application by Dorking Football Club Limited for a 25
year lease. A draft lease was issued by MVDC and commented on by the Clubs
lawyers. It was close to finalisation. At the request of MVDC at the last
minute, these negotiations were put on hold as part of the Thomfeld negotiations for the
surrounding site. The Club co-operated fully with MVDC during this period at the
request of MVDC. We were only informed by MVDC that these negotiations were at an
end in 2006. During the period to 2006, there was a real possibility that the Club
would have been wholly or partially re-developed as part of the Thomfeld plans. No
sensible organisation would have at that time invested money into a repair programme and
this was acknowledged by MVDC. In 2002, when the site was in a worse state of repair
than currently is the case, MVDC were prepared to grant a long lease to the Club.
Why now do MVDC seek to remove the Club?
3. Recently
appointed Council officers are giving the Club no credit nor allowance for its community
status nor for the period during which the Thomfeld negotiations took place, when the Club
actively supported MVDCs position. It is also ignoring the substantial work
carried out by the Club in recent weeks. This is palpably unfair.
4. In
Spring 2007, MVDC tried various bullying tactics to remove the Club from the site.
It then changed tactics by trying to rely on health and safety legislation in the seeming
hope that the Club would not meet the requirements. The Club has worked extensively
to satisfy MVDC on the health and safety area, expending large sums of money and we
believe that we have satisfied all statutory requirements. To now find in the
context of the immediate history above, MVDC are issuing press releases, and possible
court action (again we have seen no papers from MVDC here) without earlier notice to us,
telling the public that they are to remove us from the site is extremely galling and
unjust.
5. The
Club strongly disputes that the site is in a serious state of dis-repair. It meets
current FA ground grading repairment and there are far worse sites in the level of
football at which Dorking Football Club is currently playing.
Dorking Football Club Limited will not be bullied into departing the site
it has occupied for many decades. Dorking Football Club is a community asset run for
the benefit of the community by hard working volunteers and we are extremely disappointed
that our locally elected representatives are taking such draconian, unjustified steps
against a voluntarily run organisation. The Club is strongly advised that it is a
protected tenant under the Landlord & Tenant Act and cannot simply be removed from the
site. It has been actively seeking a new long lease from MVDC for a number of years
in order that it can tap into extensive grant funding that is available, but MVDC seem to
be disinterested in this fact.
We ask MVDC and its councillors to reconsider this ill-thought out action
to avoid needless expenditure on lawyers and professional fees on both sides, something
the Club would prefer to avoid so it can invest in a repair programme as part of a new
lease and in its youth football work. However, if MVDC insist on taking court
action, the Club will defend itself through its professional advisers and in court.
A fuller response will be made in due course.
For and on behalf of Dorking Football Club Limited
13 November 2007 |